Search for: "Glaxo-SmithKline" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2015, 10:00 am by Ackerman Law Office
However, Glaxo SmithKline also marketed it for use with pregnant women. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:49 pm
Noonan -- On October 9th, SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 4:56 am
By Donald Zuhn -- Last Wednesday, Plaintiffs-Appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:59 am
Plaintiffs-Appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:41 am
By Donald Zuhn -- On Wednesday, SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd., and two of which support Defendants-Appellants the USPTO and Director Dudas. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:39 pm
Glaxo SmithKline beats back Kentucky case [Longstreth, AmLaw Daily] Court in Australia deems litigation funding pact improper as "unregistered managed investment scheme" [New Lawyer] Should docs be careful what they ask for? [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:34 am
Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Also seeking a rehearing of the Federal Circuit's decision in Tafas were plaintiffs-appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:09 pm
Unsolicited email is beginning to arrive in people's inboxes soliciting clients to sue over the Glaxo SmithKline diabetes drug, Avandia. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:03 pm by Ben Vernia
Reuters reported on May 10 that District Judge Roger Titus of Maryland granted former Glaxo SmithKline attorney Lauren Stevens’ motion for a judgment of acquittal in her trial for obstruction of justice. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Cir. 2009, 08-1352) Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively “Appellees”) originally filed suit against the USPTO in relation to  Final Rules published by the USPTO that  placed [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
The Court in its order noted that plaintiff-appellees Tafas and Glaxo SmithKline had requested rehearing by the original panel and rehearing en banc (see Patent Docs reports on Tafas Petition and GSK Petition), and that the Court had invited briefing from the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:43 pm
A jury in Philadelphia ordered Glaxo-SmithKline to pay 2.5 million dollars to compensate for birth defects caused by Paxil. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Glaxo-SmithKline, et al., No. 06-1111, slip op. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am by Antitrust Today
The court had previously allowed the plaintiffs to proceed with allegations that Glaxo SmithKline (formed by the merger of Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham in 2000) caused them to overpay for Flonase by repeatedly filing sham citizen petitions that stalled the entry of generic nasal sprays into the market. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:29 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. dba GlaxoSmithKline, 2007-001813, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). [read post]